Document Type
Essay
Publication Date
2025
Publication
George Washington Law Review
Volume
93
Abbreviation
Geo. Wash. L. Rev.
First Page
1299
Abstract
Juries have long been considered a key common law institution, yet their use has become quite uncommon in common law systems over time. Rather than trials by juries, most criminal cases are instead resolved by way of guilty pleas. The prevalence of guilty pleas is not merely a matter of defendants’ independent choices to accept responsibility and give up the right to a trial. Common law countries have adopted various legal structures over the past half century that incentivize guilty pleas and discourage trials.
This Essay will document the decline of jury trials and the rise of guilty pleas in five common law countries—Australia, England and Wales, New Zealand, Scotland, and the United States. The Essay will begin by identifying the formal right to a jury trial in these countries, including variations on that formal right—namely whether it is enshrined in a written constitution, protected only as a matter of statute, or merely accepted as a matter of tradition. The Essay then turns to modern practice, chronicling both the rates of guilty pleas and the formal legal structures that incentivize defendants to plead guilty. The Essay will conclude with some observations about why the jury, which was once perceived as a cherished common law institution, has become a bureaucratic hurdle to be overcome in the name of efficiency.