Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2024
Publication
Florida International University Law Review
Volume
18
Abbreviation
FIU L. Rev.
First Page
609
Abstract
This Article compares the U.S. government’s responses to the 2008 Financial Crisis and the economic crisis triggered by the COVID‑19 pandemic, examining both legislative action and regulatory intervention. It evaluates how the Dodd‑Frank Act reshaped emergency tools and how Congress and regulators adapted or temporarily suspended those constraints in 2020. The analysis focuses on Section 13(3) Federal Reserve lending, the FDIC’s systemic-risk exception, and the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund, showing how their roles differed significantly across the two crises. The Article highlights the far larger and more direct pandemic‑era relief directed to households and small businesses, contrasting it with the banking‑focused interventions of 2008. It identifies six key lessons—act quickly, act forcefully, act on multiple fronts, maintain confidence, ensure liquidity, and support the vulnerable—and reflects on the political and moral‑hazard consequences of repeated large‑scale interventions.